LLM Inference Benchmark Explorer
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash on 8× DGX Spark — FP8, vLLM, TP8, speculative decoding k=5 inference benchmark
Open this configuration in the LLM Inference Benchmark Explorer
| Model | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash |
|---|---|
| Parameters | 763B |
| Intelligence Index | 39.5 |
| Agentic Index | — |
| Device | 8× DGX Spark |
| Quantization | FP8 |
| Max C | 2 |
| Chat Capacity | 8 |
| Agentic Capacity | 3 |
| TP | 8 |
| DP | — |
| PP | — |
| Engine | vLLM |
| Speculative Decoding | Yes |
| C | TTFT (ms) | TPS (tok/s) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 199 | 33.28 | PASS |
| 2 | 301 | 26.76 | PASS |
| 4 | 401 | 17.07 | FAIL |
| 8 | 554 | 11.74 | FAIL |
In OpenZeka's measurement, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (763B parameters), served in FP8 format with vLLM and speculative decoding on 8× DGX Spark (TP=8), reached a generation speed of 33.3 tok/s per request and a time to first token (TTFT) of 199 ms with a single request.
Considering the speed targets and the available KV cache capacity, the estimated capacity is 8 users for chat use and 3 for agentic use. The realistic capacity will likely fall between these two values. In scenarios dominated by coding, tool use, long workflows and multi-agent use, capacity approaches the agentic estimate; where shorter interactions, standard conversations and lighter tasks dominate, it approaches the chat estimate.
Notes: DSpark k=5, 1M context, Engram-on-disk. Model: deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Intelligence Index and Agentic Index values are published by Artificial Analysis and are reproduced here with attribution.
In OpenZeka's measurement, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (763B parameters), served in FP8 format with vLLM and speculative decoding on 8× DGX Spark (TP=8), reached a generation speed of 33.3 tok/s per request and a time to first token (TTFT) of 199 ms with a single request.
Considering the speed targets and the available KV cache capacity, the estimated capacity is 8 users for chat use and 3 for agentic use. The realistic capacity will likely fall between these two values. In scenarios dominated by coding, tool use, long workflows and multi-agent use, capacity approaches the agentic estimate; where shorter interactions, standard conversations and lighter tasks dominate, it approaches the chat estimate.